IT Compliance
What Is Data Encryption and Why Does It Matter?
Joseph Sena

For many San Francisco startups, SOC 2 readiness becomes urgent when revenue is on the line. An enterprise customer requests your SOC 2 report. A routine security questionnaire turns into a deep review of your controls. Procurement pauses the deal until your SOC 2 audit is complete.
At the same time, industry leaders warn that the rise of fast, high-volume SOC 2 solutions is increasing pressure to produce reports that lack depth and professional skepticism, weakening overall audit credibility. Speed may temporarily close a gap, but it does not build trust.
Service Organization Control 2, or SOC 2, is an attestation framework governed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or AICPA. It evaluates how a service organization protects customer data under the Trust Services Criteria, or TSC, which include security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.
SOC 2 readiness is not about rushing documentation. It is about proving your security controls operate consistently and that you can produce defensible evidence during the audit process. This practical checklist helps you move from reactive remediation to structured, audit-ready discipline.
A SOC 2 audit is performed by a CPA firm and results in a SOC 2 report. Readiness happens before that engagement begins.
SOC 2 Type 1 evaluates control design at a point in time. SOC 2 Type 2, sometimes written as SOC 2 Type II, evaluates whether those controls operated effectively over several months. Enterprise buyers often expect a Type 2 report because it demonstrates sustained operational effectiveness.
Being audit-ready means your internal controls are in place before fieldwork begins. You are not building policies for the auditor. You are demonstrating maturity.
IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report found U.S. organizations now pay $10.22 million on average to recover from a breach, a record high that’s 9% above last year
SOC 2 requirements go beyond policy statements. Your security controls must align with the Trust Services Criteria and operate consistently.
You must demonstrate access controls, risk assessment processes, change management logs, vendor risk documentation, and incident response workflows. Evidence collection is where most teams struggle. It is not enough to state that MFA is enforced. You must show logs, access reviews, and remediation tracking.
SOC 2 compliance is operational proof.
Startups often move fast, but speed creates blind spots. A CTO may still hold global administrator rights. Contractors may use unmanaged devices. Security policies may exist informally but lack written documentation.
Without defined ownership, readiness assessment efforts stall. Without documentation, internal controls do not count during validation.
Clear accountability and disciplined documentation prevent time-consuming remediation during the audit process.
Start with defined control ownership.
These steps reduce the risk of unauthorized access and strengthen customer trust.
In fact, ISACA reports that 55% of cybersecurity teams are currently understaffed, meaning many startups lack a dedicated owner for critical controls.
Auditors scrutinize process discipline.
Risk management must be practiced, not assumed. Strong process discipline reduces vulnerabilities and supports smoother SOC 2 audits.
Technology should reinforce your internal controls.
Layered cybersecurity controls reduce mitigation costs and strengthen your security posture before the SOC 2 audit begins.
A clean SOC 2 report depends on structured evidence collection aligned to the Trust Services Criteria.
Provide documentation of privileged accounts and completed access reviews. Demonstrate how you prevent unauthorized access to customer data.
Maintain a current asset inventory and documented patching cadence. Show vulnerability remediation timelines to demonstrate proactive risk management.
Retain system-generated training completion records. These documents demonstrate preventive sensitive information security practices.
Maintain a documented incident response plan and records from testing exercises. Show how mitigation and recovery are practiced, not theoretical.
Maintain a vendor inventory documenting service providers, access levels, and vendor risk assessments. Third-party oversight is a core component of SOC 2 compliance and often overlaps with ISO 27001 standards.
Verizon’s Data Breach Investigations Report shows 68% of breaches involve a human element.
Founders retaining global administrator rights create unnecessary audit risk. Reduce privileges and enforce role-based access controls.
Unmanaged endpoints introduce vulnerabilities and weaken your security posture. Standardized configurations support data protection and audit validation.
Unsanctioned SaaS tools undermine data security and security compliance. Conduct periodic reviews to identify gaps in your application ecosystem.
If a control is not documented, it does not count during your SOC 2 audit. Use structured templates and recurring evidence collection routines to prevent last-minute remediation.
A team of 40 with a centralized identity can complete readiness faster than a distributed organization of 400. Scale directly affects access reviews and scoping complexity.
Centralized identity simplifies evidence collection and supports audit-ready reporting. Fragmented identity increases remediation effort and risk exposure.
Organizations with mature security policies and internal controls complete readiness assessments more efficiently. Documentation gaps extend audit timelines.
Using a single identity provider improves access controls, simplifies evidence collection, and reduces inconsistencies during validation. Fragmented authentication environments increase risk and slow the audit process.
Even as detection improves, IBM found that organizations still take an average of 241 days to identify and contain a breach, underscoring the need for continuous monitoring for SOC 2 readiness.
Reduce the number of privileged accounts, enforce MFA, and conduct immediate access reviews. Clean access controls significantly reduce risk before your SOC 2 audit.
Establish consistent endpoint management and documented patch cycles. This strengthens your security posture and aligns with ISO 27001.
Begin collecting access logs, risk assessment documentation, vendor questionnaires, and incident response records now. Early evidence collection simplifies your SOC 2 report later.
SOC 2 readiness becomes sustainable when controls operate on a monthly basis. A recurring readiness assessment routine prevents reactive remediation.
SOC 2 compliance fails when controls exist only on paper. Parachute helps embed structured routines, so controls operate consistently between audits.
We centralize identity, standardize endpoint configurations, and enforce documented access controls so your evidence collection is consistent and defensible.
Our reporting aligns with auditor expectations. Instead of scrambling during the audit process, you maintain structured documentation that supports validation.
Not every automation tool reduces audit risk. We help identify gaps and prioritize security controls that meaningfully strengthen your SOC 2 report.
A clean SOC 2 audit is rarely the result of a short sprint. It is the byproduct of disciplined routines across identity, endpoints, vendor oversight, and incident response.
When risk management becomes part of daily operations, compliance becomes sustainable. Your SOC 2 report then serves as confirmation of maturity, not proof of emergency effort.
Talk to Parachute about building a phased SOC 2 readiness roadmap aligned to your growth.
Most teams complete readiness in 3 to 6 months, depending on identity maturity, documentation, and device standardization. A SOC 2 Type 2 engagement requires additional monitoring time before the Type 2 report is issued.
Start by centralizing identity, reducing privileged accounts, and enforcing MFA. Clean access controls simplify your SOC 2 audit and reduce remediation risk.
Automation supports sustainable evidence collection and continuous monitoring. However, tools alone do not ensure SOC 2 compliance. Controls must be owned, documented, and consistently executed.